中科大家长论坛

 找回密码
 加入论坛

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

楼主: bjxsjz

冷静对待排名

[复制链接]
wuding 发表于 2010-9-19 10:06:44 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的出发点是好的,但认识只能说是仁者见仁、智者见智了。或许您送孩子去科大的时候是觉得想去清华去不了、去科大也是不错的,但对部分像我这样的家长来说,清华、北大随便上,但认为科大是最好的,所以就报了科大了。从做学问和读书这二个方面来讲,我认为国内没有比科大更好的学校了。
抱歉很少露面,本人孩子是科大二代。
mgrand 发表于 2010-9-19 10:17:29 | 显示全部楼层
MIT首页转载了此次排名
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2010/times-higher-ed-rankings.html

MIT ranked third among world’s top 200 universities
Times Higher Education annual survey uses new methodology that focuses on research and teaching.

MIT had previously been ranked ninth in the survey, but the Institute’s position jumped as Times Higher Education revised its methodology to place less importance on reputation and heritage and to give more weight to hard measures of excellence in research and teaching.

“We would like to congratulate The Massachusetts Institute of Technology for its performance in this year’s rigorous rankings. Being ranked three in the world top 200 is an impressive achievement,” said Ann Mroz, editor of Times Higher Education. “The top 200 universities in the world represent only a tiny fraction of world higher education, and any institution that makes it into this table is truly world-class.”

To compile this year’s rankings, Times Higher Education relied on data provided by Thomson Reuters and on an invitation-only reputation survey of more than 13,000 verified academics. Each school’s ranking includes 13 separate performance indicators across five broad categories: teaching (30 percent), research influence, as measured by citations (32.5 percent), research volume, income and reputation (30 percent), international diversity (5 percent) and research income from industry (2.5 percent).

The annual survey was first published in 2004.
mgrand 发表于 2010-9-19 10:24:16 | 显示全部楼层
小平同志以前说得好,莫争论,向前走.  这次我们全体科大人都来祝贺,然后再努力.
ray913 发表于 2010-9-19 10:27:21 | 显示全部楼层
回复 21# wuding
楼上说的好。说实话,科大这样的孩子不少,自己的孩子也是这样,有时候觉得老提这个真没劲,没办法,有人太神话清北了。

“版主说的没错。但至少现在中科大没有超过清华”-----这个东西没有绝对的,看你比哪个方面。
 楼主| bjxsjz 发表于 2010-9-19 10:40:21 | 显示全部楼层
对“晓风残月”帖子的几点回复:
1.,“凭什么中科大不能超过清华?就凭9常委里面好几个都是清华的?” 到底是不是?
2,“比历史久远、比政治正确,科大的确拍马都赶不上清华”  到底是不是?
3,“但是如果以这个标准,拿清华去比哈佛,比牛津,恐怕清华人自己都不好意思开口” 你偷换了概念。
4,“说实话,在这里大家都是“科学家”,”你自己都把自己加了“引号”
5,“楼主不要在科学家面前丢人现眼。”请注意素质!
晓风残月 发表于 2010-9-19 10:45:33 | 显示全部楼层
回复 25# bjxsjz

对于被洗脑了的人,我懒得多回复。
这里科学家加引号,是“科大学生的家长”的简称~调侃一下你而已,不必气坏身子。
远洋 发表于 2010-9-19 10:48:32 | 显示全部楼层
大水冲了龙王庙一家人不认一家人了,呵呵
 楼主| bjxsjz 发表于 2010-9-19 10:51:59 | 显示全部楼层
回复"晓风残月",“对于被洗脑了的人,我懒得多回复。”看来你是无法回复
wikd 发表于 2010-9-19 10:52:00 | 显示全部楼层
bjxsjz =北京新生家长?

大水冲了龙王庙一家人不认一家人了,呵呵
淡雅 发表于 2010-9-19 10:55:19 | 显示全部楼层
又是一个被神话清北的谎言洗脑了的

凭什么中科大不能超过清华?就凭9常委里面好几个都是清华的?

...
晓风残月 发表于 2010-9-19 10:03


你说的不错!
楼主说的也不错!
只是站的角度不同而已,
同是科学家换位思考哈~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入论坛

本版积分规则

渝ICP备19009968号|公安备案号50010502000023|手机版|中科大家长网

GMT+8, 2024-11-27 09:51 , Processed in 0.165333 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表